Development workflow¶

Overview¶

# hack hack
git add my_new_file
git commit -am 'NF - some message'
git push

In more detail¶

1. Make some changes

2. See which files have changed with git status (see git status). You’ll see a listing like this one:

   # On branch ny-new-feature
   # Changed but not updated:
   #   (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
   #   (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
   #
   #  modified:   README
   #
   # Untracked files:
   #   (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
   #
   #  INSTALL
   no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
   

3. Check what the actual changes are with git diff (git diff).

4. Add any new files to version control git add new_file_name (see git add).

5. To commit all modified files into the local copy of your repo,, do git commit -am 'A commit message'. Note the -am options to commit. The m flag just signals that you’re going to type a message on the command line. The a flag — you can just take on faith — or see why the -a flag? — and the helpful use-case description in the tangled working copy problem. The git commit manual page might also be useful.

6. To push the changes up to your forked repo on github, do a git push (see git push).

Delete a branch on github¶

git checkout master
# delete branch locally
git branch -D my-unwanted-branch
# delete branch on github
git push origin :my-unwanted-branch

(Note the colon : before test-branch. See also: http://github.com/guides/remove-a-remote-branch

Several people sharing a single repository¶

If you want to work on some stuff with other people, where you are all committing into the same repository, or even the same branch, then just share it via github.

First fork scikit-fuzzy into your account, as from Making your own copy (fork) of scikit-fuzzy.

Then, go to your forked repository github page, say http://github.com/your-user-name/scikit-fuzzy

Click on the ‘Admin’ button, and add anyone else to the repo as a collaborator:

Now all those people can do:

git clone git@githhub.com:your-user-name/scikit-fuzzy.git

Remember that links starting with git@ use the ssh protocol and are read-write; links starting with git:// are read-only.

Your collaborators can then commit directly into that repo with the usual:

git commit -am 'ENH - much better code'
git push origin master # pushes directly into your repo

Explore your repository¶

To see a graphical representation of the repository branches and commits:

gitk --all

To see a linear list of commits for this branch:

git log

You can also look at the network graph visualizer for your github repo.

Finally the Fancy log output lg alias will give you a reasonable text-based graph of the repository.

Rebasing on trunk¶

Let’s say you thought of some work you’d like to do. You Update the mirror of trunk and Make a new feature branch called cool-feature. At this stage trunk is at some commit, let’s call it E. Now you make some new commits on your cool-feature branch, let’s call them A, B, C. Maybe your changes take a while, or you come back to them after a while. In the meantime, trunk has progressed from commit E to commit (say) G:

      A---B---C cool-feature
     /
D---E---F---G trunk

At this stage you consider merging trunk into your feature branch, and you remember that this here page sternly advises you not to do that, because the history will get messy. Most of the time you can just ask for a review, and not worry that trunk has got a little ahead. But sometimes, the changes in trunk might affect your changes, and you need to harmonize them. In this situation you may prefer to do a rebase.

rebase takes your changes (A, B, C) and replays them as if they had been made to the current state of trunk. In other words, in this case, it takes the changes represented by A, B, C and replays them on top of G. After the rebase, your history will look like this:

              A'--B'--C' cool-feature
             /
D---E---F---G trunk

See rebase without tears for more detail.

To do a rebase on trunk:

# Update the mirror of trunk
git fetch upstream
# go to the feature branch
git checkout cool-feature
# make a backup in case you mess up
git branch tmp cool-feature
# rebase cool-feature onto trunk
git rebase --onto upstream/master upstream/master cool-feature

In this situation, where you are already on branch cool-feature, the last command can be written more succinctly as:

git rebase upstream/master

When all looks good you can delete your backup branch:

git branch -D tmp

If it doesn’t look good you may need to have a look at Recovering from mess-ups.

If you have made changes to files that have also changed in trunk, this may generate merge conflicts that you need to resolve - see the git rebase man page for some instructions at the end of the “Description” section. There is some related help on merging in the git user manual - see resolving a merge.

Recovering from mess-ups¶

Sometimes, you mess up merges or rebases. Luckily, in git it is relatively straightforward to recover from such mistakes.

If you mess up during a rebase:

git rebase --abort

If you notice you messed up after the rebase:

# reset branch back to the saved point
git reset --hard tmp

If you forgot to make a backup branch:

# look at the reflog of the branch
git reflog show cool-feature

8630830 cool-feature@{0}: commit: BUG: io: close file handles immediately
278dd2a cool-feature@{1}: rebase finished: refs/heads/my-feature-branch onto 11ee694744f2552d
26aa21a cool-feature@{2}: commit: BUG: lib: make seek_gzip_factory not leak gzip obj
...

# reset the branch to where it was before the botched rebase
git reset --hard cool-feature@{2}

Rewriting commit history¶

There’s an embarrassing typo in a commit you made? Or perhaps the you made several false starts you would like the posterity not to see.

This can be done via interactive rebasing.

Suppose that the commit history looks like this:

git log --oneline
eadc391 Fix some remaining bugs
a815645 Modify it so that it works
2dec1ac Fix a few bugs + disable
13d7934 First implementation
6ad92e5 * masked is now an instance of a new object, MaskedConstant
29001ed Add pre-nep for a copule of structured_array_extensions.
...

and 6ad92e5 is the last commit in the cool-feature branch. Suppose we want to make the following changes:

• Rewrite the commit message for 13d7934 to something more sensible.
• Combine the commits 2dec1ac, a815645, eadc391 into a single one.

We do as follows:

# make a backup of the current state
git branch tmp HEAD
# interactive rebase
git rebase -i 6ad92e5

This will open an editor with the following text in it:

pick 13d7934 First implementation
pick 2dec1ac Fix a few bugs + disable
pick a815645 Modify it so that it works
pick eadc391 Fix some remaining bugs

# Rebase 6ad92e5..eadc391 onto 6ad92e5
#
# Commands:
#  p, pick = use commit
#  r, reword = use commit, but edit the commit message
#  e, edit = use commit, but stop for amending
#  s, squash = use commit, but meld into previous commit
#  f, fixup = like "squash", but discard this commit's log message
#
# If you remove a line here THAT COMMIT WILL BE LOST.
# However, if you remove everything, the rebase will be aborted.
#

To achieve what we want, we will make the following changes to it:

r 13d7934 First implementation
pick 2dec1ac Fix a few bugs + disable
f a815645 Modify it so that it works
f eadc391 Fix some remaining bugs

This means that (i) we want to edit the commit message for 13d7934, and (ii) collapse the last three commits into one. Now we save and quit the editor.

Git will then immediately bring up an editor for editing the commit message. After revising it, we get the output:

[detached HEAD 721fc64] FOO: First implementation
 2 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
[detached HEAD 0f22701] Fix a few bugs + disable
 1 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/my-feature-branch.

and the history looks now like this:

0f22701 Fix a few bugs + disable
721fc64 ENH: Sophisticated feature
6ad92e5 * masked is now an instance of a new object, MaskedConstant

If it went wrong, recovery is again possible as explained above.