Using the flufl.enum library

The flufl.enum package provides yet another enumeration data type for Python. While this is similar intent to the reject PEP 354, this package defines an alternative syntax and semantics.

An enumeration is a set of symbolic names bound to unique, constant integer values. Within an enumeration, the values can be compared by identity, and the enumeration itself can be iterated over. Enumeration items can be converted to and from their integer equivalents, supporting use cases such as storing enumeration values in a database.

Motivation

[Lifted from PEP 354]

The properties of an enumeration are useful for defining an immutable, related set of constant values that have a defined sequence but no inherent semantic meaning. Classic examples are days of the week (Sunday through Saturday) and school assessment grades (‘A’ through ‘D’, and ‘F’). Other examples include error status values and states within a defined process.

It is possible to simply define a sequence of values of some other basic type, such as int or str, to represent discrete arbitrary values. However, an enumeration ensures that such values are distinct from any others, and that operations without meaning (“Wednesday times two”) are not defined for these values.

Creating an Enum

Enumerations are created using the class syntax, which makes them easy to read and write. Every enumeration value must have a unique integer value and the only restriction on their names is that they must be valid Python identifiers. To define an enumeration, derive from the Enum class and add attributes with assignment to their integer values.

>>> from flufl.enum import Enum
>>> class Colors(Enum):
...     red = 1
...     green = 2
...     blue = 3

Enumeration values are compared by identity.

>>> Colors.red is Colors.red
True
>>> Colors.blue is Colors.blue
True
>>> Colors.red is not Colors.blue
True
>>> Colors.blue is Colors.red
False

Enumeration values have nice, human readable string representations...

>>> print Colors.red
Colors.red

...while their repr has more information.

>>> print repr(Colors.red)
<EnumValue: Colors.red [int=1]>

The enumeration value names are available through the class members.

>>> print Colors.__members__
['red', 'green', 'blue']

Let’s say you wanted to encode an enumeration value in a database. You might want to get the enumeration class object from an enumeration value.

>>> cls = Colors.red.enumclass
>>> print cls.__name__
Colors

Enums also have a property that contains just their item name.

>>> print Colors.red.enumname
red
>>> print Colors.green.enumname
green
>>> print Colors.blue.enumname
blue

The str and repr of the enumeration class also provides useful information.

>>> print Colors
<Colors {red: 1, green: 2, blue: 3}>
>>> print repr(Colors)
<Colors {red: 1, green: 2, blue: 3}>

You can extend previously defined Enums by subclassing.

>>> class MoreColors(Colors):
...     pink = 4
...     cyan = 5

When extended in this way, the base enumeration’s values are identical to the same named values in the derived class.

>>> Colors.red is MoreColors.red
True
>>> Colors.blue is MoreColors.blue
True

However, these are not doing comparisons against the integer equivalent values, because if you define an enumeration with similar item names and integer values, they will not be identical.

>>> class OtherColors(Enum):
...     red = 1
...     blue = 2
...     yellow = 3
>>> Colors.red is OtherColors.red
False
>>> Colors.blue is not OtherColors.blue
True

Ordered comparisons between enumeration values are not supported. Enums are not integers!

>>> Colors.red < Colors.blue
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError
>>> Colors.red <= Colors.blue
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError
>>> Colors.blue > Colors.green
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError
>>> Colors.blue >= Colors.green
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError

Equality comparisons are defined though.

>>> Colors.blue == Colors.blue
True
>>> Colors.green != Colors.blue
True

You also cannot compare enumeration values directly against their integer equivalents...

>>> Colors.red < 3
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError
>>> Colors.red <= 3
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError
>>> Colors.blue > 2
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError
>>> Colors.blue >= 2
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError

...unless you are doing equality comparisons.

>>> Colors.blue == 3
False
>>> Colors.green != 3
True

If you really want the integer equivalent values, you can convert enumeration values explicitly using the int() built-in. This is quite convenient for storing enums in a database for example.

>>> int(Colors.red)
1
>>> int(Colors.green)
2
>>> int(Colors.blue)
3

You can also convert back to the enumeration value by calling the Enum class, passing in the integer value for the item you want.

>>> Colors(1)
<EnumValue: Colors.red [int=1]>
>>> Colors(2)
<EnumValue: Colors.green [int=2]>
>>> Colors(3)
<EnumValue: Colors.blue [int=3]>
>>> Colors(1) is Colors.red
True

The Enum class also accepts the string name of the enumeration value.

>>> Colors('red')
<EnumValue: Colors.red [int=1]>
>>> Colors('blue') is Colors.blue
True

You get exceptions though, if you try to use invalid arguments.

>>> Colors('magenta')
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: magenta
>>> Colors(99)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: 99

The Enum base class also supports getitem syntax, exactly equivalent to the class’s call semantics.

>>> Colors[1]
<EnumValue: Colors.red [int=1]>
>>> Colors[2]
<EnumValue: Colors.green [int=2]>
>>> Colors[3]
<EnumValue: Colors.blue [int=3]>
>>> Colors[1] is Colors.red
True
>>> Colors['red']
<EnumValue: Colors.red [int=1]>
>>> Colors['blue'] is Colors.blue
True
>>> Colors['magenta']
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: magenta
>>> Colors[99]
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: 99

The integer equivalent values serve another purpose. You may not define two enumeration values with the same integer value.

>>> class Bad(Enum):
...     cartman = 1
...     stan = 2
...     kyle = 3
...     kenny = 3 # Oops!
...     butters = 4
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Multiple enum values: 3

You also may not duplicate values in derived enumerations.

>>> class BadColors(Colors):
...     yellow = 4
...     chartreuse = 2 # Oops!
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Multiple enum values: 2

The Enum class support iteration. Enumeration values are returned in the sorted order of their integer equivalent values.

>>> [v.enumname for v in MoreColors]
['red', 'green', 'blue', 'pink', 'cyan']
>>> [int(v) for v in MoreColors]
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Enumeration values are hashable, so they can be used in dictionaries and sets.

>>> apples = {}
>>> apples[Colors.red] = 'red delicious'
>>> apples[Colors.green] = 'granny smith'
>>> for color in sorted(apples, key=int):
...     print color.enumname, '->', apples[color]
red -> red delicious
green -> granny smith

Differences from PEP 354

Unlike PEP 354, enumeration values are not defined as a sequence of strings, but as attributes of a class. This design was chosen because it was felt that class syntax is more readable.

Unlike PEP 354, enumeration values require an explicit integer value. This difference recognizes that enumerations often represent real-world values, or must interoperate with external real-world systems. For example, to store an enumeration in a database, it is better to convert it to an integer on the way in and back to an enumeration on the way out. Providing an integer value also provides an explicit ordering. However, there is no automatic conversion to and from the integer values, because explicit is better than implicit.

Unlike PEP 354, this implementation does use a metaclass to define the enumeration’s syntax, and allows for extended base-enumerations so that the common values in derived classes are identical (a singleton model). While PEP 354 dismisses this approach for its complexity, in practice any perceived complexity, though minimal, is hidden from users of the enumeration.

Unlike PEP 354, enumeration values can only be tested by identity comparison. This is to emphasis the fact that enumeration values are singletons, much like None.

Acknowledgments

The flufl.enum implementation is based on an example by Jeremy Hylton. It has been modified and extended by Barry Warsaw for use in the GNU Mailman project. Ben Finney is the author of the earlier enumeration PEP 354.

Table Of Contents

Previous topic

flufl.enum - A Python enumeration package

Next topic

NEWS for flufl.enum

This Page